My Teaching Philosophy Statement

April 22nd, 2020

I recently had occasion to update my teaching philosophy statement, which I haven’t done in a few years. It was an enlightening and useful exercise. If you’re interested, I’ve posted it here.

I’ve learned in life that the easy way isn’t always the best way; so too in teaching, the easy way is rarely the most effective. I have best learned when teachers took the time to understand my current skill level, gave me examples to follow, allowed me to emulate those examples, and then provided feedback that pointed out what I’ve done correctly as well as areas where I could improve. I have attempted throughout my teaching career to follow in the footsteps of those educators who inspired and taught me.

The specifics of how I organize and plan a course and how I teach it depends on the exact content and goals of the course, but my general methods of teaching are as follows:

1) Engage the students in discussion in order to gauge their current understanding of the topic as well as help them locate previous knowledge they can connect the new information to.

2) Introduce new information.

3) Discuss strategies and tools that students can use.

4) Analyze examples with the students so they become familiar with what works and what does not.

5) Model how to utilize the tools and strategies.

6) Allow the students to try the techniques on their own or work collaboratively with them.

7) Assign meaningful homework that allows students to explore their new skills, challenging them but not discouraging them.

8) Use peer feedback when appropriate and instructor feedback to encourage growth and remediate misunderstandings.

9) Build on previous lessons through the use of repetition of key concepts while new ideas are presented.

Not all students enter institutions of higher education prepared to complete college-level coursework. Simply assuming that they possess particular skills or that they can “figure it out” risks setting up both the students and the instructor for failure. This is where providing students with strategies and tools comes into play. Strategies and tools can give students a place to start and a direction in which to move. Designed properly, they can be used by students beyond individual classes to make them more self-sufficient and successful in their broader coursework and their careers outside of school.

I’ve seen that students utilize strategies and tools more effectively when I have modeled their use for them. Searching a database for articles on a topic, taking notes from an article, drafting a summary, completing planning steps for an essay, and even drafting an essay while standing in front of a class can be nerve-wracking at times, and it’s certainly harder than simply telling students what they need to do, but my training in fiction writing rings in my ears as a reminder of best practices: show, don’t tell. Modeling techniques and behaviors allows students to see what success can look like, and if I struggle in front of them at times, they can see that their struggles are completely natural.

Beyond giving my students strategies and tools and showing them how to use them, I am most concerned with students’ ability to think critically and analytically about the texts they read and the words they write. Such experiences should strengthen their critical-thinking skills in general while also helping them to communicate their ideas more effectively. Students need to be trained to look at the big picture to determine if a piece of writing is effective and to question whether or not the quality of the composition reflects on the messages contained within.

When it is time to focus on the details of writing, I feel that rote grammar exercises concerned with definitions or the identification of parts of speech and lessons that utilize low-engagement exercises such as fill-in-the-blanks are ineffective at helping students achieve mastery of academic and professional English and clarity of expression. Grammar and style instruction should focus more on the function of words and how they can be used to express ideas. Activities that requires students to write sentences using particular parts of speech or constructions allow them to learn by doing, thus connecting that practice to their writing habits. Again, this is not easy. A simple answer key cannot be used to gauge student success in such activities, but most assessments that can use a key are testing lower-hanging fruit on Bloom’s Taxonomy. I’m concerned more with application and creation as well as students’ ability to analyze and evaluate their own writing and the writing of others—at both the macro and micro levels.

A concrete example of my beliefs in action is my redesign in the spring of 2020 of an online remedial English course. The original version of the course contained an overwhelming number of grammar worksheets in the first third of the term. The second third of the term contained assignments that requested students to summarize short readings with little explanation of how to approach reading for the purpose of writing an academic summary or what a good summary should contain. The final segment of the course focused on writing short essays—with only limited time for peer or instructor feedback to be provided to allow students to fully engage in the revision process. It is my belief that this course organization was detrimental to students’ learning. Separating grammar, reading and summarizing, and essay writing does not allow students to connect those into a holistic discipline of engagement with information, which they will need in school and beyond.

My redesigned course starts with essay writing to place students in that mindset right away, and it provides individual weeks devoted to planning and drafting, peer review, and revision for each essay. During that time, students also work on close-reading exercises that build up to writing academic summaries, and they take part in sentence-writing exercises aimed at getting them to think analytically about their use of language to avoid common errors. The course is designed to follow a consistent pattern in the hopes that the students develop effective new writing habits that they will carry with them beyond the term.

Do I think I know all there is to know about teaching? Hardly. In my experience, teachers can be most effective when they view teaching as a two-way act of communication in which both parties are open and receptive to each other, to exploring new ideas, and to the possibility that everyone has the room and potential to improve and grow. It is just as important for teachers to be willing to learn and grow as it is for students. I do my best to remove my ego from the situation so that I can be more self-reflective and open to improvements, and I am always looking for ways to be a more effective instructor. If a student struggles to understand a concept or a task that has been assigned, I work with them to attempt to alleviate that confusion, and then I look for ways to add clarity to the course materials to avoid similar confusion in the future. Just as I believe that writing should be more about the reader than the writer, I believe teaching to be more about the student than the teacher.

The Time Is Now! (For Bidets)

March 14th, 2020

Ok, America. Time for real talk. About your rear ends.

Now that the apocalypse is upon us and toilet paper is a commodity worthy of fighting in the streets for, maybe it’s time to install some bidet seats.

Give them a try in this time of TP scarcity, and you won’t go back. Trust me.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but wiping yourself with a little square of thin paper is kind of ridiculous. You’re basically just smearing stuff around, and you’re leaving residue all over yourself.

A stream of water is much more efficient at cleaning. It’s also much more environmentally friendly–you may be using additional water at home, but by cutting down on your use of TP, you are saving way more water than you are using.

When I hooked up our first bidet seat, I was nervous trying it out. Sure, it takes some getting used to, but it’s a normal part of the process now.

I actually purchased and installed the first seat without consulting my wife because I was sure of two things: 1) she would have shot the idea down and 2) if she tried it, she would be all for it. My gamble paid off. At first, she was irritated and weirded out, but after a couple days, she was sold, and now she’s like me: being away from home and not having a bidet is a pain in the butt.

Want to know more? Here’s a great overview video from Tech Insider:

And then there’s this lovely visual:

While there are expensive bidets with electronics and such, we really weren’t set up for that, so I went for something more basic. I’ve made sure, however, to get models with a hot water hookup (it connects to the hot water line of your sink) to help keep things from freezing in the winter (I’m hoping the exaggeration is obvious, but it is nice to have warm water hitting your nether regions when it’s cold).

  1. Disclosure: If you purchase items from the links below within a certain amount of time of clicking on them, I will earn a small portion of the sale. That does not affect my recommendations, though. For more information, see the full affiliate disclosure.

Here’s our current model, which is an attachment that goes under your existing toilet seat:

We started with a model by BioBidet that was integrated into its own seat with a lid, and I still miss the first one–the “aim” felt a bit more accurate–but the plastic of the seat started degrading after a couple years and cracking, hence the new one.

It seems to be holding up well, and it does the job. The temperature controls have a lot more effect on the temperature than our old model–it can go from cold tap water to super hot if you let it (depending on the temperature that you keep your household hot water at).

We’ve also been using this when traveling:

It can be a little awkward, but it’s nice to have a solution on the road. Though it’s not as effective as a full bidet, this could also be a good way to give the bidet concept a try–but if you’re easily frustrated, just go for a cheap seat so that you aren’t turned off by the difficulty before you experience the benefits.

So, that’s my little rant on the state of American posteriors. What questions do you have? Hit me up below or on social media. I’ll be happy to talk bidets.

Hobby WIP Wednesday 1/29/20

January 29th, 2020

Nothing much exciting to report–some work piled up, so I needed to spend a lot less time on hobby projects this week. No video of a completely magnetized Primaris Infiltrator / Incursor just yet. Soon.

I managed to clean up sprue lines from a couple pieces and magnetize a couple more. Didn’t quite like the results on magnetizing the pouches for the Primaris Infiltrator because the top of the pouch was not sitting anywhere near flush with the dude’s upper thigh, and I ended up with two magnets in his thigh and two in the pouch.

Primaris Infiltrator with thigh magnets and magnetized ammo pouches.

Primaris Infiltrator with thigh magnets and magnetized ammo pouches. At least there’s only one magnet in the Incursor knives.

Blah.

Primaris Infiltrator with thigh magnets and magnetized ammo pouches with pouches attached.

I think the pouches look OK attached to to leg. They seem to lie naturally.

On the next one, I’m going to try two magnets in the thigh (upper one for the pouch, and lower one for the knives), but only the upper one in the pouch. See how that goes.

Other than that, I did some stripping for the first time.

Stripping paint. From models. What were you thinking?

I have a ton of miniatures from playing D&D as a teen. While I have an emotional attachment to all of them to some degree, I need to be realistic about the fact that they’ve mostly all been in storage at my parents’ place for more than a decade. If I ever get back into D&D like I keep saying I am, I’d likely not use as many miniatures. Sorry, but do I have the space and money to keep a miniature that will be used once in a campaign for one random encounter? Not really. It’s time to liquidate some assets, and I’m more likely to sell these guys if they aren’t caked in twenty-five-year-old paint.

Now, if you go online and search “how to strip miniatures,” you’re going to find lots of very passionate people who are passionate about their method of choice. After watching a number of videos on YouTube, this one sealed it for me:

So, I stopped at the dollar store last week and picked up a 32-oz bottle of LA’s Totally Awesome for, yup, a dollar. I then tossed a bunch of plastic and metal minis in a plastic bottle and poured enough of the stuff into it to cover all of the miniatures.

Bottle of LA's Totally Awesome and an empty plastic bottle for stripping paint from miniatures.

Bottle of LA’s Totally Awesome and an empty plastic bottle for stripping paint from miniatures.

It sat on the shelf for three days or so before I opened it. The clear liquid had gone super cloudy.

LA's Totally Awesome in a plastic bottle after soaking painted miniatures in it for a number of days.

LA’s Totally Awesome in a plastic bottle after soaking painted miniatures in it for a number of days.

I used tweezers to fish some models and bits from the murky depths. Some paint had dissolved (obviously, from the look of the liquid), with a couple metal miniatures completely devoid of paint. Most required scrubbing with an old paint brush and an old toothbrush.

I hadn’t thought to take pictures before starting the process, which I now regret–but some of the miniatures still had enough paint on them before scrubbing to provide an idea of what they looked like before the stripping process began.

Ral Partha gnoll raider about to be scrubbed of paint.

Ral Partha gnoll raider about to be scrubbed of paint.

Ral Partha gnoll raider after scrubbing.

Ral Partha gnoll raider after scrubbing: the head and weapon were separate pieces that had been glued on with CA glue. I’m not sure if LA’s TA normally dissolves the stuff or not. This one needed to go back into the dunk tank after the first scrubbing.

Ral Partha ogre about to be scrubbed of paint.

Ral Partha ogre about to be scrubbed of paint.

Ral Partha ogre after scrubbing.

This guy came clean really easy.

Another Ral Partha ogre about to be scrubbed of paint.

Another Ral Partha ogre about to be scrubbed of paint. I also finally put on a glove–not that I’d been dunking my hand in the chemical bath, but still . . .

Another Ral Partha ogre mostly clean of paint.

This one came mostly clean. He did go back into the bath to soak the last bit of paint.

Of course, here are the color-test models from last week:

Red, white, and blue LOTR high elves from the front.

Red, white, and blue LOTR high elves from the front.

And the results:

LotR High Elves color-test models after being stripped of paint.

LotR High Elves color-test models after being stripped of paint. These were the least successful models, with some white paint residue (I don’t think I used true primer on these guys twenty years ago) and a bit of metallic around the armor. I put them back into the LA’s TA this morning and will give them another little scrub at some point in the next couple days.

Here are all the models and bits that I stripped this week:

All the stripped miniatures.

My first batch of stripped miniatures. From D&D minis to Rogue Trader-era 40K Space Marines . . . Overall, I’m impressed with the results.

That’s for about $0.50 in cleaning fluid . . . which I don’t plan to dump. After I gather up another batch of minis to clean, they are going right into this soup to soak. There’s my Depression-era grandmother’s sensibilities affecting me again.

Hoping to have more magnetization and assembly done by next week! Then I’m likely going back to experimenting with some painting techniques on the 2nd-Edition Marines. I wanted to have a Kill Team roster done by now, but I want things done to a certain standard, and I have to give myself time to knock off the rust and try out new techniques.